CO129-033 - General Stavely - Lieut. Governor - 1850 [5-8] — Page 360

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

3

354

and commenced building, the adjoining land had not been apportioned into lots, and the said Mr. Gordon also assured him that when the said land was allotted out into suburban lots, and that it would be in larger building lots, such apportionments would not be allowed to interfere with his right of way, nor would his privileges as first settler be encroached upon.

That at the time there were no buildings in the neighbourhood of any description, and that the Chinese Town was then located in what now forms the centre of the Town of Victoria, and a considerable distance from the said Inland Lot No. 444.

That, subsequently, to wit on July 1844, the Chinese Town was, in accordance with the Government Notification to that effect, removed from its former site to Exi-ping-shaw, where it at present remains.

That the said Inland Lot No. 444 is situated right in the middle of the present Chinese Town, and that the said Thomas M. Wright, deceased, having valuable buildings erected thereon, and which he had occupied with his family as a residence for two or 9 years; was, when the land in Taipingshaw was put up for auction by the Government, forced to purchase the respective lots bounding his property on each side, in order to preserve the valuable buildings aforesaid from depreciation, as if he had not done so, there would have been Chinese houses within three feet of the door and windows of his said residence, and also he would have had to pull down the house, as the entrance to it was through the lots adjoining, which, consequently, he was obliged to buy.

That, although at the time he bought the said lot No. 444, it was well worth the ground rent payable with the adjoining lots No. 143, 143a and 205, yet now it, together with them, are so depreciated in value, that the whole of the said 3 lots, although they have been improved upon at an immense expense, and added to the residence aforesaid, are commonly known (collectively) as the Brook Cottage property, will not, owing to the disagreeable vicinity of the Chinese houses, let for the annual ground rent.

That the ground rent payable annually on the said lots Nos. 444, 205, 143 and 143a amounts to £. 91.7.

Page 360

Page 361

Edit History

2026-05-17 17:13:36 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
3 354 and commenced building, the adjoining land had not been apportioned into lots, and the said Mr. Gordon also assured him that when the said land was allotted out into suburban lots, and that it would be in larger building lots, such apportionments would not be allowed to interfere with his right of way, nor would his privileges as first settler be encroached upon. That at the time there were no buildings in the neighbourhood of any description, and that the Chinese Town was then located in what now forms the centre of the Town of Victoria, and a considerable distance from the said Inland Lot No. 444. That, subsequently, to wit on July 1844, the Chinese Town was, in accordance with the Government Notification to that effect, removed from its former site to Exi-ping-shaw, where it at present remains. That the said Inland Lot No. 444 is situated right in the middle of the present Chinese Town, and that the said Thomas M. Wright, deceased, having valuable buildings erected thereon, and which he had occupied with his family as a residence for two or 9 years; was, when the land in Taipingshaw was put up for auction by the Government, forced to purchase the respective lots bounding his property on each side, in order to preserve the valuable buildings aforesaid from depreciation, as if he had not done so, there would have been Chinese houses within three feet of the door and windows of his said residence, and also he would have had to pull down the house, as the entrance to it was through the lots adjoining, which, consequently, he was obliged to buy. That, although at the time he bought the said lot No. 444, it was well worth the ground rent payable with the adjoining lots No. 143, 143a and 205, yet now it, together with them, are so depreciated in value, that the whole of the said 3 lots, although they have been improved upon at an immense expense, and added to the residence aforesaid, are commonly known (collectively) as the Brook Cottage property, will not, owing to the disagreeable vicinity of the Chinese houses, let for the annual ground rent. That the ground rent payable annually on the said lots Nos. 444, 205, 143 and 143a amounts to £. 91.7. Page 360 Page 361
Baseline (Original)
3 354 and commenced building, the adjoining land had not bcew apportioned into lots, and the said Mr. Mr. Gordon also. assured him that when the said land was allotted out, or suburbian lots, and that it would be in larger building. that suck apportionments would not be allowed to interfere with his right of way, nor would his privileges avero J10 buildings in the as first settler be encroached upont That at the time there. neighbourhood of any description, and that the Chineão Town was then located in what now " forms the centre of the Town of Victoiw, and a considerable distance from the said Inland Lob No 444. in That, subsequently, to wit on July 1844, the Chinese Town was, in accordance with the Government Notification to that effect, removed effect, removed from its former site to Exi-ping-shaw, where it at present remains. That the said Inland Lot No. 44 is situated Bright in the middle of the present Chinese Cown, and that the said Thomas Mỹ. Wnight, deceased, having valuable building erected thereon, and which he had occupied with his family as a pelidence o for two . 9 years; was, when the land in in Taiping thaw was put up for - put up for auction by the Government; forced to purchase the respectivo let's bounding his property on each side, in order to preserve the wakuable buildings a fore sued from depreciation, as if he had not done so, there would have been Chinese houses within three feet of the door and windows : of his · : said residence, and also he would have had to pull down the house, as the entrance to it was consequently, he was through the lots adjoining, which, 1 obliged to buy. ' at the time he bought the said. That, although ab Ale ou lot No 444, it was well worth the ground rent, payable with the adjoining lots Not 143, it, yet now it, together 143a and 205, are to depreciated in value, that: the whole of the paid 3 lots, although they have been improved upon at an immense expense, and added to the residenced afuerad are commonly knoww (collectively) as the, Brook Cottage property, will not, owing to the disagreeable vicinity of the Chinese houses, let for the annual; That the & al gesund rent. ground rent payable annually our the said lots Nos. 44, 205, 143 and 143x 6. amounts to L. 91.7. Page 360Page 361
2026-05-17 17:13:36 · Baseline
View content

3

354

and commenced building, the adjoining land had not

bcew apportioned into lots, and the said Mr.

Mr. Gordon

also.

assured him that when the said land was allotted out,

or suburbian lots, and

that it would be in larger building. that suck apportionments would not be allowed to

interfere with his right of way,

nor would his privileges

avero J10

buildings

in the

as first settler be encroached upont

That at the time there.

neighbourhood of any description, and that the Chineão

Town was then located in what now

" forms the centre of

the Town of Victoiw, and a considerable distance from the said Inland Lob No 444.

in

That, subsequently, to wit on July 1844, the

Chinese Town was, in accordance with the Government

Notification to that effect, removed

effect, removed from its former site to Exi-ping-shaw, where it at present remains.

That the said Inland Lot No. 44 is situated

Bright in the middle of the present Chinese Cown, and that the said Thomas Mỹ. Wnight, deceased, having valuable building erected thereon, and which he had occupied with

his family

as a pelidence

o for two

.

9 years;

was,

when the

land in

in Taiping thaw was put up for

- put up for auction by the Government; forced to purchase the respectivo let's

bounding his property on each side, in order to preserve

the wakuable buildings a fore sued from depreciation, as if he had not done so, there would have been Chinese houses

within three feet of the door and windows

: of his

· :

said

residence, and also he would have had to pull down the house,

as the entrance to it was

consequently, he was

through the lots adjoining, which,

1 obliged to buy.

' at the time he bought the said.

That, although ab

Ale ou

lot No 444, it was well worth the ground rent, payable with the adjoining lots Not 143,

it, yet now it, together

143a and 205, are to depreciated in value, that: the whole of the paid 3 lots, although they have been improved upon at an immense expense, and added to the residenced afuerad

are

commonly knoww (collectively) as the, Brook Cottage property, will not, owing to the disagreeable vicinity of the Chinese houses, let for the annual;

That the

&

al gesund rent.

ground rent payable annually our the said lots Nos. 44, 205, 143 and 143x

6.

amounts to L. 91.7.

Page 360Page 361

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.